A 25,000-Year-Old Pyramid Might Be a Consequence of Weather

Archaeological intrigue surrounds Gunung Padang in Java, Indonesia. Initially considered a multi-layered prehistoric pyramid dating back 25,000 years, skeptics like Flint Dibble and Bill Farley question whether it was even built by human hands, suggesting natural weathering as an alternative explanation. Responding to criticism, lead researcher Danny Hilman Natawidjaja calls for global researchers to investigate further.

As the debate intensifies, critics dispute the claims, emphasizing the lack of clear human-made features and the possibility of natural processes shaping Gunung Padang. Co-editor Eileen Ernenwein initiates an investigation into the publication's claims. Despite ongoing debates, Natawidjaja maintains his stance, inviting researchers worldwide to explore Gunung Padang. The site, once thought groundbreaking, faces scrutiny, potentially redefining its historical significance.

Amid the unfolding controversy, Archaeological Prospection and its publisher, Wiley, actively investigate the research paper's claims. Co-editor Eileen Ernenwein confirms an ongoing investigation aligned with ethical guidelines. Natawidjaja dismisses skepticism, inviting researchers to Indonesia for further studies.